Forgot password?  |  Register  |    
User Name:     Password:    
Review   

PixlKids: Brave: The Video Game Review


See PixlBit's Review Policies

On 07/31/2012 at 04:24 PM by Angelo Grant

What happens when kids review a children’s title? You get surprisingly honest results.
RECOMMENDATION:

For kids whose ages are still in the single digits, or children who have yet to learn traditional video game mechanics. Anyone else will likely find no value here.

Reviewing children’s titles is always tricky business. As adults, it really is impossible to mentally travel back to our developmental years and place the game in its proper perspective. The only way to truly get around these limitations would be to have a child perform the task. On the positive side, as long as there’s no motivation for them to lie, kids are usually brutally honest, even to the point of being impolite. On the other hand, children lack the perspective, critical reasoning, and linguistic skills necessary to create their own reviews. They also tend to be very polar in their opinions, meaning anything they like automatically gets 5 stars, while games they hate earn zero with no middle ground. Clearly this is a problem. The solution? Have daddy help.

In order for this to work, I had to keep my own personal involvement to a minimum. I watched my kids play the game after giving it a quick hands-on myself in order to assess the game’s mechanics and make sure the game isn’t broken. The goal is to offer a critical assessment of their experience with the title, not my own, since they are the intended audience. Their ages are 9 and 12 which fits nicely around the game’s E 10+ rating.

So let’s get the mechanical assessment out of the way. It’s essentially a God of War-style brawler (obviously lacking God of War’s mature content,) with light, Zelda-like puzzle elements, such as block puzzles and pressure plates. There isn’t much depth to it, which suits its target audience. You can fire arrows, which can be upgraded to pass through enemies as well as fire multiple projectiles with each button press, and you can swing your sword for a short combo. Your sword strokes can be upgraded in damage and hits per combo as well. There are also other bonuses in the upgrade system such as regenerating health, increased life meter, and the ability to “suck up” items from further away.

Brave and I got off on the wrong foot almost immediately when a rather condescending narrator announced that I would be jumping with “B” and firing my bow with “A”. Seriously? I had assumed that the tradition of “A” always being the jump button was established when I was a child, but not in this case, and there is no way to change the controls.

There were also a couple of other glaring flaws I noticed, such as coins from defeated enemies slipping right through walls, making them invisible. The combat feels squishy and some of the animation and audio is downright horrendous. Also the game is short. Both children were able to finish it in under six hours. All of this drove me downright batty, but here’s the interesting part: the kids didn’t care about any of it.

Now honestly, I’m not surprised that they didn’t care about the lack of precision in the combat. After all, this is a button masher, not Ninja Gaiden or Bayonetta. I was taken aback when I discovered that the “A – B” swap didn’t bother them at all, but perhaps they aren’t as fused to a default scheme at their age as I am now. They did have issues with other parts of the game, and we agreed completely on the overall score, but what they took issue with in the game is radically different than what I did.

Both of them felt the game started off strong. They were even willing to trade games they loved, like Mario 64 and Steel Diver to play it, but Brave wore out its welcome fast and both children changed their mind after an hour or two of play. At that same time, they both stated the game was far too easy, especially considering there are no repercussions for failure at all. If your character’s health goes to zero, the game stops for a second while she swoons, then a bunch of coins to fly out of her. She’s then given a portion of her health bar back and the game resumes exactly where it left off as if nothing happened. If you find yourself lacking funds at any point, you can also “grind” levels to earn more currency, but they had no need for this, and both children were fully powered up by the end of the game. Sometimes this affects an arbitrary “rank,” awarded at the end of a level, but despite multiple deaths at the hands of bosses, the kids always earned a gold rank in boss battles for some reason. Normal levels weighed their performance a little more accurately, accounting for the amount of deaths, coins collected, and items found. Surprisingly, none of that meant anything to them. They never reacted to getting any score, regardless of what it was.

Those boss battles were another sticking point. All of them are only simply slight variations on the exact same thing. There’s no creativity at all in these encounters, including the final battle. Without spoiling too much, a creative opportunity is completely wasted resulting in a very anticlimactic ending.

The game also features an element based attack system, where enemies are weak against a certain element. No mental skill is required to figure out the balance of this system however, as an icon corresponding to the element the enemy is weak against hovers over each one of their heads. The gameplay is also halted for some mini game puzzles that you need to complete in order to progress. These are all games you’ve seen before, such as moving stones around on a board so that you can slide one of the stones off, or sliding some tiles with lines on them around in order to complete “circuits.” Both of them got stuck on one or two of them for about 15 min, which wasn’t all that bad, and probably helped break up some of the monotony of the combat.

So in the end, I helped the children assign a score to the game by breaking the terms of our review policy into language they could easily understand. They both came to the conclusion that the game was middle-of-the-road compared to other games they had played, and that the lack of repercussions for failure and other issues left it feeling somewhat broken. It was a genuine and fair assessment that my experience with the game could not argue with. Our reasons may have been different, but at the end of our experience, we concluded that Brave is a fun, average quality game, and that its flaws hold it back from being anything more.

Review Policy

In our reviews, we'll try not to bore you with minutiae of a game. Instead, we'll outline what makes the game good or bad, and focus on telling you whether or not it is worth your time as opposed to what button makes you jump.

We use a five-star rating system with intervals of .5. Below is an outline of what each score generally means:


All games that receive this score are standout games in their genre. All players should seek a way to play this game. While the score doesn't equate to perfection, it's the best any game could conceivably do.


These are above-average games that most players should consider purchasing. Nearly everyone will enjoy the game and given the proper audience, some may even love these games.


This is our middle-of-the-road ranking. Titles that receive three stars may not make a strong impression on the reviewer in either direction. These games may have some faults and some strong points but they average out to be a modest title that is at least worthy of rental for most.


Games that are awarded two stars are below average titles. Good ideas may be present, but execution is poor and many issues hinder the experience.


Though functional, a game that receives this score has major issues. There are little to no redeeming qualities and should be avoided by nearly all players.


A game that gets this score is fundamentally broken and should be avoided by everyone.


 

Comments

Jon Lewis Staff Writer

07/30/2012 at 12:26 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

haha, very unique review. Seems like they know what they are talking about.

Angelo Grant Staff Writer

07/31/2012 at 05:29 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

Glad you like it! This is an experiment of sorts, and if our readers find it interesting enough, I might branch out into other things like discussing how the children play classic games, and what sorts of things they enjoy. We'll see how it goes.

Julian Titus Reviews Editor

07/31/2012 at 05:58 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

I really, really love this review. And I think children are the devil, so all the more impressive.

Jason Ross Senior Staff

08/02/2012 at 06:11 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

I forgot to mention this on PB & Jason, but know that I meant to do so! Reviews from the audience perspective are always something nice, so I hope to see more of these from you, Angelo!

Angelo Grant Staff Writer

08/07/2012 at 12:36 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

You may have inadvertently given me a potential new PixlKids project in our recent twitter conversation. We'll have to see how it goes.

Jason Ross Senior Staff

08/07/2012 at 06:22 PM Reply | Permalink | Report

Two things: That's why you should read the holiday gift guides we make at PixlBit...

And

That's why I need someone in game development to work with me to create the game idea I've posed in PB & Jason, of course.

Log in to your PixlBit account in the bar above or join the site to leave a comment.

Support

Hot Story

Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Review

Imagine for a moment that you’re the world’s perfect predator, and you have an open and sprawling city that is now your playground after being at rest in the shadows for hundreds of years. You’re sneaking up on your prey, salivating at the heartbeat that is about to feed you when you suddenly step on a twig. The echo of this twig somehow alerts every known enemy of yours, and you’re suddenly flanked and flayed mercilessly without ever being given the chance to fight back. This is Lords of Shadow 2: everything sounds great in theory, yet nothing works the way it’s intended to do so.

Read More...