Forgot password?  |  Register  |    
User Name:     Password:    

Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time Review

See PixlBit's Review Policies

On 02/27/2013 at 12:00 PM by Jesse Miller

With little interest in the future, Sly's latest outing meddles mostly in the past.

Long-time series fans will not be disappointed, and those unfamiliar with the gang's past exploits will find still find Thieves in Time very accessible, even if it doesn't really tread new ground.

Mascot games are kind of my thing. Mario, arguably the first ever platform “mascot” (with all apologies to Pitfall Harry and Pac-Man), is the dude that lured me into a lifelong obsession with video games in the first place. I gobble up practically every one I come across and among them the Sly Cooper games have remained a stand-out franchise. With a trilogy of games hitting the PlayStation 2, it seemed only natural that Sly would find his way to the PlayStation 3. But with Sucker Punch moving on to inFAMOUS it seemed any hope of a current generation Sly game would be going up in smoke. Thankfully Sanzaru, developer of the acclaimed HD trilogy treatment, stepped up to the plate and took the series in its charge. Could they regain Sly’s former glory?

The answer: mostly.

Thieves in Time picks up right where the last game left off. Having faked amnesia in order to slip into a relationship with Carmelita (which sounds all sorts of creepy when I think about it), Sly has put up his trademark cane and mask, seemingly for good. Of course Sly’s retirement is far from permanent, and when Bentley discovers that entire sections of the Thievious Raccoonus are mysteriously disappearing, Sly leaps at the chance to partake in some thievery one last time.

In order to find out what’s happening to the missing pages, Bentley constructs a time machine using Murray’s super awesome van, and the gang sets off on a world tour that spans space and time.

Time travel may be old hat when it comes to video game clichés, but Thieves in Time doesn’t offer much up in the way of pseudo-science for you to get bogged down with plausibility. It‘s an admittedly weak plot device, but completely inoffensive at the same time. It’s all expectantly tongue-in-cheek and naturally littered with small references to time traveling classics like Back to the Future and Doctor Who.

I have to hand it to Sanzaru; they really stepped up to the plate in terms of characterization and story. The Sly games have greatly improved in this regard from game to game and Thieves in Time continues this trend, offering some of the most touching and funniest moments in the series thus far. Sly in particularly has come a long way since his rather boorish portrayal in the original, especially when he gets to use his “fantastic Italian accent!”

It’s immediately apparent that the folks at Sanzaru have a great love for this franchise. Their treatment of the HD collection alone is proof enough (it’s certainly one of the best HD collections ever produced) and it shines through here. Longtime Sly fans will find Thieves in Time a comfortable fit - aside from the monkey logo that displays as the game loads, you’d think that Sucker Punch was still at the helm.

That said, there is such a thing as adoring the source too much. In most respects, Thieves in Time is indistinguishable from other entries in the series. Mission structure mimics that of the second game, while the game’s many collectables are a sly combination (see what I did there?) of bottle and treasure hunts from the first and third. Sly, Bentley, Murray, and even Carmelita control and have virtually the same move sets that they did in the last outing. It’s not that these elements don’t work - they worked well before and still hold up - but the game doesn’t try anything new.

Sly has been gone from the scene for quite some time, getting his first game on the PS3 in the system’s twilight months. Nostalgia will only take you so far, and I was hoping to see more “newness” in a game I‘ve waited so long to arrive.

That’s not to say that the game doesn’t try anything new. Traveling through time offers the unique opportunity to play as a few of Sly’s ancestors. Each new character is well developed (the oldest in the Cooper lineage - a cave raccoon - was good for quite a few chuckles) and is equipped with their own special ability that you’ll wish Sly could utilize. In particular, I found the feudal Japanese flavor of Sly, Rioichi Cooper, possessed an ability that I very much wished Sly himself could used called the Ninja Spire Jump. This move would propel Rioichi from one spire point to another in a flash - shrinking the map and making travel and stealth that much more effective.

While players may yearn for Sly to posses the prowess of his ancestor’s, the game does offer some consolation in the form of new disguises. The element of the disguise isn’t new to the Cooper games, but they’ve never offered up anything beyond the ability to blend. This time around, each disguise - five in all - bestows a special ability that Sly can only use when wearing it. Certain jobs are built around the mechanic introduced by the disguise, but you can also travel in time to stages you’ve previously completed to open “disguise specific doors” that hide special treasures - giving the collectors out there reason to go back to each level later in the game.

The Sly games have always been rather striking. The cel-shaded graphics have ensured that the series has aged well - the third still looks like it could be current gen - and Thieves in Time doesn’t disppoint in its art style. That said, the levels do suffer from overuse of asset packages, making most areas on maps indistinguishable beyond a few standout set pieces. This made navigating for me a bit of a pain since everything looked so similar.

Enemies also suffered from lack of variety, having stuck the standard set of two roof dwellers and one bruiser per level. I understand the lack of variety in the originals, but the PS3 is a beefier machine. Since enemies are mostly just different graphical depictions of the same base models your strategy for dealing with them will never change through the game, leading to enemy fatigue the longer you play.

Bosses are wonderfully colorful and spout forth some of the best dialogue in the series, but won’t challenge the player too much when it comes time to do battle. Figuring out their pattern of attack is rather simple, and from there its all about repetition, repetition, repetition. Slight variations appear here and there, but nothing that will force you to change your tactics all that much. You’ll have to place personal challenges (perhaps trophy driven ones) in order to derive any real satisfaction in bringing them down.

Thieves in Time is a labor of love. I hate nit-picking a title that was released below the $60 price point (coming in at $40 this game is quite the value). I hate it even more knowing that it’s really a miracle that this game was developed and released at all, but it doesn’t mean I can ignore its faults. Fans of the series can take solace knowing that my only real gripe is that the series hasn’t really been brought forward - it’s another iteration of the old - and that’s perfectly alright.

It’s a good game, and I urge PlayStation owners longing for a mascot game to pick it up. But next time - and here’s hoping there is a next time - step it up. Instead of playing around in the past, bring the future to Sly and the gang.

Review Policy

In our reviews, we'll try not to bore you with minutiae of a game. Instead, we'll outline what makes the game good or bad, and focus on telling you whether or not it is worth your time as opposed to what button makes you jump.

We use a five-star rating system with intervals of .5. Below is an outline of what each score generally means:

All games that receive this score are standout games in their genre. All players should seek a way to play this game. While the score doesn't equate to perfection, it's the best any game could conceivably do.

These are above-average games that most players should consider purchasing. Nearly everyone will enjoy the game and given the proper audience, some may even love these games.

This is our middle-of-the-road ranking. Titles that receive three stars may not make a strong impression on the reviewer in either direction. These games may have some faults and some strong points but they average out to be a modest title that is at least worthy of rental for most.

Games that are awarded two stars are below average titles. Good ideas may be present, but execution is poor and many issues hinder the experience.

Though functional, a game that receives this score has major issues. There are little to no redeeming qualities and should be avoided by nearly all players.

A game that gets this score is fundamentally broken and should be avoided by everyone.




02/27/2013 at 12:07 PM

I really like the shading and color is the screenshots. Great looking game

Matt Snee Staff Writer

02/27/2013 at 12:10 PM

If I had a Vita, I would get it.  


02/27/2013 at 12:52 PM

Matt, it's a PS3 game...

Matt Snee Staff Writer

02/27/2013 at 04:50 PM

yeah I know, but I would never play this on a console.  I play few console games as it is.....


03/10/2013 at 12:33 AM

You mean I CAN'T play this on my Atari 2600?!  Well what's the point anymore?!

Jesse Miller Staff Writer

02/27/2013 at 12:54 PM

...with Vita cross play.  So, if you buy the PS3 version you get a free copy of the Vita game for DL.


02/27/2013 at 02:18 PM

I will probably buy this game at some point. I loved the first three games and don't mind that it's similar at all. Thanks for the review.


02/27/2013 at 02:30 PM

This game looks great.  Without playing it before, it reminds me of Legend of Kay alittle.

I've been scouting games for my Vita, and there is a Physical vita copy for around 30.00 in addition to the crossplay for PS3


02/27/2013 at 05:22 PM

I love Sly. I have the original PS2 games and one weekend EB Games has the PS3 collection for $10 so I bought that too. 

Nice review Jesse, I'll pick this one up when I have some spare cash.

Super Step Contributing Writer

02/27/2013 at 09:11 PM

Hey, I have no problem with its keeping the same basic structure of 2, I still have the first game as one of my favorites of all time, so if they kept the awesome characters and story going strong, no complaints from me ... no PS3 FOR me to play it on either, but hey, nice review! lol

Nick DiMola Director

02/28/2013 at 01:42 AM

This review pretty much seals the deal for me. I'm definitely going to pick this up. Many of the reviews were middling, but it seems like a solid game if you can accept it for what it is. Considering my intense love for such types of games, this is no-brainer once I get settled into my new place.


02/28/2013 at 05:02 AM


But I do think that, the developers played it a little too safe. Just from the demo, I could tell not a lot of new things were brought in.


02/28/2013 at 05:25 PM

I think after not having a title for seven years, it is okay to basically make one like the old ones. This happens to combine the best of the first three games by merging the hub worlds of 2/3 with linear missions that feel more like the first one. The ancestors even add the variety that the third game attempted, but with the ancestors they don't feel so far away from the Sly gameplay that is still the series strongpoint. Thieves in Time ended up being my favorite Sly game by a good bit. I hope Sanzaru gets to make another one or I'd even be up for them making a new Jak game since ND seems to not be into that.


02/28/2013 at 09:53 PM

So, if I've only played one level of one Sly game then Thieves in Time should be nice and fresh and new. So I should play it first and work my way backwards.


03/01/2013 at 05:45 AM

Thieves in Time is a lot of fun. I really enjoy being able to play in the different time periods as members of Sly's family. I love the art style of this game. The only complaint I have is that I don't really like the parts that use the six axis motion control. Thankfully those bits are few.

Log in to your PixlBit account in the bar above or join the site to leave a comment.