I don't care so much if a franchise is milked so long as it stays good. See Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, etc.
I don't care so much if a franchise is milked so long as it stays good. See Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, etc.
I only rented Judgement, but as someone who was very satisfied with all three Gears titles, it bored me to tears. Something about the enemy encounters were just not as fun as 1-3.
There absolutely is variation on the enemies, it's one of Bungie's Halo's best parts. 2 and 3 replaced Elites with Brutes, they integrate vehicles in a seemless way no other FPS really does, the Flood makes an appearance in all of the trilogy. It's not even close to the same three over and over. I was playing 3 the other day and was impressed at how varied the battlefields and enemy placement is in this game. If you got bored with it, there's nothing wrong with that, but what you're saying is simply not true.
That's true of almost every long running franchise though. How many times can you jump over a pit in Mario? How many times can you find the Morph Ball in Metroid or select attack in Final Fantasy? There's underappreciated talent that goes into making more of the same feel fresh, something I felt Halo did a good job with in the preceding titles.
Ehhhhh.....wait for my review. They both make me sad
Good to see you back man. Agree on MGSV despite its flaws, but not gonna lie: I hated Halo 5. I feellike gaming lost something it may never get back after playing.
I've heard a lot of good things about that game
Thank you! Check out the newest Backloggers Anonymous for more of my thoughts on Tomb Raider